Is Refinancing Too Late for Seniors?

Today's mortgage rates may allow some retirees to refinance and recoup lost income from low deposit rates.
Our articles, research studies, tools, and reviews maintain strict editorial integrity; however, we may be compensated when you click on or are approved for offers from our partners.


As a general rule, older people have been more victims than beneficiaries of today’s low interest rates. However, some may turn that around by taking a fresh look at refinancing.

Due to a combination of factors, refinancing is no longer just for younger homeowners. Retirees today may find refinancing their home a sensible option, but there are a few questions they should ask themselves before they commit.

Conventional wisdom — and a twist

Conventional wisdom has long been that it doesn’t pay to refinance if you are not going to be in your house much longer. That tended to leave retirees out — by that age, people are often looking to downsize their properties, not renew a mortgage commitment.

As a result, older Americans have usually been on the short side of the current low-interest-rate environment. As people who have accumulated savings, they are hurt by low savings account rates, while generally not being in a position to benefit from low mortgage rates. However, it may be time to rethink that equation.

The reason it doesn’t pay to refinance when you don’t going to be in your house much longer is that you would incur new closing costs up front, and would only have a limited number of years in which to reap any interest savings to offset those costs.

But the new twist is that mortgage rates have dropped so precipitously that it can take fewer years to offset closing costs. Combine that with the fact that people are living longer, healthier lives, and conditions are now more in favor of a retiree owning a home long enough to benefit from refinancing.

How to refinance with a shorter time frame

Refinancing calculators don’t always suit seniors because they make comparisons over the length of a mortgage, meaning that they assume a 15- or 30-year time frame. Here are ways you can look into refinancing with a shorter time frame.

  1. Set a time frame. Start by deciding what your own time frame is likely to be. No one can predict the future, but you can likely make a reasonable estimate of how long you will be willing and able to stay in your home.
  2. Calculate mortgage savings over your time frame. Compare a mortgage at today’s interest rates with your current mortgage to see what the savings would be, but only count the savings that would occur within your time frame for staying in your home. That way, you are not factoring in savings that you are never likely to see.
  3. Consider a shorter mortgage. When taking the above step, consider a shorter mortgage. A 15-year mortgage will save you about 0.70 percent compared with a 30-year mortgage, and older home owners have often paid off enough years of their mortgage that this is a more similar replacement anyway. That extra 0.70 percent in savings can be the kicker that makes refinancing pay off over a shorter time frame.
  4. Compare savings within your time frame with closing costs. Compare the savings you would realize within the time you plan to stay in the house with the closing costs on a new mortgage. Be sure to factor in any pre-payment penalty on the existing mortgage. This comparison will tell you whether refinancing will benefit you in that time frame.

Low savings account rates have made budgets tight for many retirees, but a well-planned refinance may be a way to free up some room in their budgets and finally see a benefit from today’s low-rate landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: I have a mortgage on a rental property in the amount of $17,000 at 7%. Is there any way to lower this interest rate without the expense of a new appraisal? I think the expense of the appraisal would wipe out any savings I’d get from the interest rate, and I plan to pay off the mortgage in 18 months.

A: This kind of question is important, because it highlights the difference that sometimes exists between the theory and the practice of financial management.

On paper, of course, refinancing at current mortgage rates would be a no-brainer. In contrast to your 7% mortgage rate, current mortgage rates are below 4% even at a 30-year term. For your purposes, given the short repayment period you have in mind, you could probably get a shorter-term loan with a mortgage rate below 3%.

Again, sounds good on paper, but what’s different about your situation compared to most mortgage discussions is your relatively low principal balance. In the greater scheme of things, this is a good “problem” to have, but it does reduce the savings available to you by refinancing. You would pay about $958 in interest on a $17,000 balance over 18 months at 7%, and about $407 at 3% percent. It’s easy to see how the various costs involved in processing a new mortgage could eat up the $551 differential.

The answer, then, might lie in a different approach. Under the circumstances, it might be worth dipping into a savings account to pay down your principal, if you have some kind of savings available. Of course, ordinarily it is good to keep some savings liquid in case you have an unexpected need for money, but there are three reasons it might make sense for someone in your situation to use savings to pay off some or all of the mortgage principal:

  1. You can rebuild this savings in 18 months or less, since that is the period over which you would have been making a similar amount of mortgage payments.
  2. Since you have no other debt, you could use a credit card for any emergency liquidity needs. This would not be a recommended long-term strategy, but as a short-term back-up in your situation, it seems viable.
  3. The interest rate differential is even more compelling than the case for refinancing. Why hand a bank 7% on your mortgage while earning less than 1% (the rate on most savings accounts these days) on your savings?

If you don’t have any likely liquidity needs for your savings in the next 18 months, this is a solution worth considering.

About Author
Richard Barrington has been a Senior Financial Analyst for MoneyRates. He has appeared on Fox Business News and NPR, and has been quoted by the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, USA Today, CNBC and many other publications. Richard has over 30 years of experience in financial services. He has earned the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation from the Association of Investment Management and Research (now the “CFA Institute”).