Understanding Lump Sum Benefits in Social Security

You might qualify for a lump sum payment of up to six months worth of retroactive Social Security payments. But is this option worth its drawbacks?
Written by Dan Rafter
Financial Expert
Managing Editor
twitter facebook
Woman holding documents and using the calculator

If you wait until after your full retirement age to claim your Social Security retirement benefits, there is a little-known rule that could entitle you to a large chunk of cash all at once. This provision enables retirees who meet this requirement to receive up to six months of retroactive benefits in one lump sum.

Sound appealing? While this option may be a great choice for some, there are several things to consider before you go for it — namely, its impact on your future benefits.

How Social Security’s lump sum option works

The rule is a bit complicated, but Kia Anderson, a spokesperson for the Social Security Administration, illustrates a possible scenario: Say a retiree reached full retirement age in November but then waited to file an application for Social Security benefits until next November. In this example, the retiree might be entitled to retroactive benefits — paid in a lump sum — beginning from May or six months before he or she finally filed for benefits.

Because of the six-month limitation on this rule, the first six months of benefits would effectively be gone for a retiree in this situation. But for those who need a large chunk of cash for an emergency or for those who are in bad health and don’t expect to live long, the six months of benefits that are still available may be much appreciated.

Still, there is a major drawback to claiming retroactive benefits in a lump sum: It will reduce your ongoing monthly Social Security benefits for the rest of your life. This means less money in your savings account and that retirees should examine their circumstances before choosing this option, says Anderson.

“It depends on a person’s individual situation as to whether they would like to file for retroactive retirement benefits,” she says.

Which Banks Have the Best Savings Account Rates?

Finding the bank with the best savings account to meet your needs as a Social Security recipient is as simple as using our search tool. Compare savings accounts and find the best rates being offered today.

Making the call

Russ Settle, founding partner with Social Security Choices in Elkton, Maryland, says it makes sense to claim the retroactive payment if you’ve received bad health news or face a financial crisis that requires an immediate infusion of cash. But in most other situations, it’s a bad move because claiming the retroactive benefits locks you into an earlier “official” retirement date, even if you waited until after your full retirement age to claim your benefits.

In other words, if you take six months of retroactive benefits in a lump sum payment at age 67 when your full retirement age is 66, your monthly Social Security payments going forward will be calculated as if you started taking payments at age 66 and a half.

“There are many situations where taking the benefits in a lump sum would not be advisable because you are lowering your monthly benefits for the rest of your life,” Settle says. “But if you expect a relatively short life expectancy, it makes sense. Giving up the money now and gaining it later assumes that you’ll be around later to get it, which might not be the case if you don’t expect to live long.”


What if I want to invest that lump sum?

You might think that you’ll be able to invest the six months of retroactive benefits wisely and that this makes taking the lump sum payment a sound financial move, even if you don’t face a financial emergency or serious health problem.

But Robin Brewton, vice president of client services with Overland Park, Kansas-based Social Security Solutions, said that clients all too often spend the money they plan to invest. She’s seen it with clients who take their Social Security benefits before they reach full retirement age and doubts that those who take the lump sum payment are any more likely to invest their sudden bundle of cash.

“They have every intention of investing that money,” Brewton says. “They believe that they can earn more in the stock market or by investing in it, even though the research proves that you can’t do that in today’s market. But people start to get those checks and they don’t do it. They spend the money. And once you’re accustomed to living on those checks, you’re not willing to set that money aside for investments.”

There are tax implications to consider, too. As much as 50 percent of your Social Security benefits are taxable if your total annual provisional income — which includes your adjusted gross income, tax-exempt interest, and one-half of your Social Security benefits — comes to $25,000 or more if you are single or $32,000 or more if you are married and filing jointly.

Up to 85 percent of your Social Security benefits are taxable if your total provisional income is higher than $34,000 if you’re single or $44,000 if you’re married and filing jointly.

Taking the lump-sum payment, then, might boost your provisional income enough to cost you at tax time.

Settle says that for most retirees, taking the lump sum payment instead of the higher monthly payments for life simply doesn’t make sense.

“In this low-interest-rate environment, getting any rate of return that would be close to the rate of return that delaying Social Security benefits would offer you is really impossible,” he says. “That assumes, of course, that you expect to live long enough to take advantage of those higher monthly benefits.”

More from MoneyRates:

6 key facts on Social Security

Preparing for Social Security: a 7-point checklist

About Author
Dan Rafter
Dan Rafter, a valued contributor at MoneyRates, brings many years of expertise in the financial sector. Specializing in areas like credit scores, lending, mortgages, and credit cards, Dan has an innate ability to simplify complex financial concepts for his readers. His insightful articles have appeared in numerous print and digital publications, making him a trusted voice in the financial community. Residing in the Chicago area, Dan continues to offer knowledge and guidance for those navigating the world of finance.
Our reviews are unbiased and thorough, focusing on consumer needs. For details, see our Editorial Policy & Methodology.