Best and Worst States for Banking 2017

See a study breaking down best and worst states for banking conditions that affect savings account rates, indicate bank failures and more.
Financial Expert
Managing Editor
twitter facebook
businessman smiling holding dollars at the city.

Is this a good time or a bad time to be a bank customer?

On the one hand, bank failures have slowed to a trickle. On the other hand, other forms of industry consolidation, in the form of mergers and acquisitions, have continued to reduce the range of bank choices available to consumers.

Another contrast can be seen in the fact that while online banking has made a variety of new services available to customers, the simple goal of earning a decent rate of interest on savings accounts and CDs has been made very difficult in today’s era of low interest rates.


Just as banking conditions generally are a mixed bag of positive and negative developments, they are also a study in contrasts as you move around the country. Banking conditions are clearly better in some states than in others.

To measure the best and worst states for banking, MoneyRates looked at four factors:

  1. Availability of choice – based on the number of banks in each state
  2. Stability – based on the percentage of each state’s banks that failed last year
  3. Customer satisfaction – based on averaging the JD Power ratings of banks with branches available in each state
  4. Access to top bank rates – based on which states have branches of banks that made the latest MoneyRates America’s Best Rates (ABR) lists of top savings accounts and money market accounts

Best States for Banking 2017

Based on the four criteria described above, here are the 10 best states for banking:

1. Texas

As of the most recent Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) data, there are 541 banks based in Texas, giving Texans the widest range of local banking choices of any state. Despite that large number of institutions, Texas suffered no bank failures last year. Plus, banks in Texas are not just financially sound but, in many cases, they offer especially competitive bank rates. Four banks from the ABR lists have offices in Texas, tied for the most in any state.

2. California

With 226 banks based in the state, California may lag well behind Texas, but it still has one of the largest numbers of choices of any state. California actually has an edge over Texas in customer satisfaction, ranking in the top 10 on average, while Texas ranked 15th.

3. Kansas

The only area in which Kansas fell outside the top 10 was in average satisfaction score, and this was still above the median.

4. Illinois

This state is a close second to Texas in the number of home-based banks and also suffered no failures last year. However, for all those choices, only one ABR bank has offices in Illinois.

5. Oklahoma

Consumers are especially happy with their banks in Oklahoma, as institutions with branches in the state had the highest average JD Power score of any state.

6. Florida (tie)

Ranking in the top 10 in the number of home-based banks means Florida offers plenty of choices. With three ABR banks having a presence in the state, those include some high-quality choices.

6. Virginia (tie)

Virginia is about middle-of-the-pack in the number of choices but stands out for the quality of those options with a top-10 rank in average customer satisfaction score.

8. Massachusetts

Ranking near the top in availability of ABR banks with high yield savings accounts and money market accounts was a big help to this state’s score, as was having no failures last year.

9. Colorado

This state’s characteristics were fairly similar to those of Massachusetts, though Colorado ranked a few spots lower for the number of choices.

10. New York

You might expect a state that is home to one of the world’s major financial centers to rank a little better than this, but where New York fell down was with a below-average score for its average customer satisfaction rating.

Worst States for Banking 2017

The following states ranked worst based on a combination of the four criteria MoneyRates used for this study:

1. Alaska

Despite its massive size geographically, Alaska has the fewest number of home-based banks of any state. That adds up to a lack of choices, and Alaskans are not particularly happy with those choices: The state ranked dead last in average customer service score among banks with local branches.

2. Rhode Island

While Rhode Island may seem like Alaska’s opposite in terms of size and location, it suffers from similar problems when it comes to banking — a limited number of locally-based choices, and very poor customer satisfaction scores.

3. Wisconsin

There are a decent number of banking choices in Wisconsin as the state ranks in the top 10 with 257 locally-based banks. Unfortunately, they are not all great choices. The state was one of just a handful to experience a bank failure in 2016 (there were just five nationally) and its average customer satisfaction score was below median.

4. Vermont

Not surprisingly for a small state, Vermont ranks among the lowest for number of banking choices, but this is exacerbated by the fact that its average customer service score is below median.

5. Pennsylvania

This state offers a decent number of choices. However, with no ABR banks having a presence in the state and suffering one of the few bank failures nationally last year, Pennsylvania residents may take issue with the quality of those choices.

6. Connecticut

A few New England states fared poorly in this study. In the case of Connecticut, the problem was a combination of a limited number of choices and poor customer service scores.

7. Arizona (tie)

Despite having relatively few locally-based banks, Arizona was one of the few states to suffer a bank failure last year.

7. North Dakota (tie)

Customer service was the downfall for North Dakota’s banks, as it ranked ahead of only Alaska in this category.

9. Michigan

This was another state done in by a very poor average customer service score.

10. Tennessee

Because so few states suffered a bank failure last year, those that did really stood out in a bad way. Tennessee was one of those states. On the plus side, it did rank in the top 10 for average customer satisfaction score.

This article began by describing some contrasts in the banking industry, and here is another one – even as the total number of banks and branches continues to decline, online banking is improving access to banking options in many areas. In time, this should reduce the difference in the quality of banking from one state to another. But for now, those differences still exist – especially for customers who prefer to bank locally.

Full Ranking of Best and Worst States for Banking 2017

If you didn’t see your state in the best or worst states lists, you’ll find it in the full ranking of all 50 states:

State (Alpha Order) Overall Rank Customer Satisfaction Score No. of Banks Based in State % of Banks Failures in State in 2016 No. of “America’s Best Rates Banks” with Locations in State
Alabama 27 3.07 166 0.00% 1
Alaska 50 2.39 7 0.00%  
Arizona 43 3.32 66 1.52% 2
Arkansas 40 3.03 127 0.00%  
California 2 3.39 226 0.00% 3
Colorado 9 3.24 141 0.00% 3
Connecticut 45 2.95 62 0.00%  
Delaware 32 3.16 41 0.00% 2
Florida 6 3.17 241 0.00% 3
Georgia 33 3.31 237 0.42% 1
Hawaii 35 3.18 12 0.00% 1
Idaho 27 3.47 32 0.00%  
Illinois 4 3.25 540 0.00% 1
Indiana 27 3.08 155 0.00% 1
Iowa 17 2.99 331 0.00% 1
Kansas 3 3.25 314 0.00% 2
Kentucky 20 3.20 190 0.00%  
Louisiana 31 3.14 143 0.00%  
Maine 34 3.20 31 0.00% 1
Maryland 23 3.25 100 0.00%  
8 3.22 169 0.00% 3
Michigan 42 2.88 136 0.00%  
Minnesota 30 2.80 372 0.00%  
Mississippi 36 3.10 98 0.00%  
Missouri 19 3.10 336 0.00%  
Montana 38 3.16 63 0.00%  
Nebraska 15 3.12 202 0.00% 2
Nevada 13 3.49 48 0.00% 1
New Hampshire
37 3.24 42 0.00%  
New Jersey 15 3.17 139 0.00% 2
New Mexico 13 3.44 58 0.00% 1
New York 10 3.13 212 0.00% 4
North Carolina
12 3.32 93 0.00% 1
North Dakota 43 2.66 87 0.00%  
Ohio 20 3.15 232 0.00%  
Oklahoma 5 3.60 228 0.00%  
Oregon 26 3.38 51 0.00%  
Pennsylvania 46 3.24 208 0.48%  
Rhode Island 49 2.93 22 0.00%  
South Carolina
20 3.38 86 0.00%  
South Dakota 38 2.90 84 0.00% 1
Tennessee 41 3.38 207 0.48%  
Texas 1 3.30 541 0.00% 4
Utah 11 3.37 57 0.00% 4
Vermont 47 3.08 23 0.00%  
Virginia 6 3.38 136 0.00% 2
Washington 24 3.30 87 0.00%  
West Virginia 18 3.29 76 0.00% 1
Wisconsin 48 3.09 257 0.39%  
Wyoming 24 3.47 45 0.00%  
Richard Barrington, a Senior Financial Analyst at MoneyRates, brings over three decades of financial services expertise to the table. His insightful analyses and commentary have made him a sought-after voice in media, with appearances on Fox Business News, NPR, and quotes in major publications like The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. His proficiency is further solidified by the prestigious Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, highlighting Richard’s depth of knowledge and commitment to financial excellence.
Our reviews are unbiased and thorough, focusing on consumer needs. For details, see our Editorial Policy & Methodology.